Anime association NAFCA (Japan Animation and Film Culture Association) said in a recent public comment that the future of AI requires greater transparency about whose work is used for training and output. The organization says that even if compensation is paid, creators will need to maintain a high level of control over their copyrighted material to avoid AI “monsters” that may violate their intentions. added.
NAFCA published a public comment “Intellectual Property Rights in the Age of AI” and submitted ideas and suggestions for future use. He stressed that the right to opt out should be granted to all works. The association is also calling on governments to invest in technology that ensures this ability, such as digital watermarking, saying: “We believe that there should never be a situation where the ‘perpetrator’ wins and the ‘victim’ remains in bed. “There is,” he added.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48b5f/48b5f045aa923156bdcdf2739f2ef324be701ba7" alt="Jujutsu Kaisen's Yuji and JJK 0's Terumi Nishii with expressions of fear"
Jujutsu Kaisen 0 Chief Animation Director: “The anime is approaching bankruptcy.”
Terumi Nishii, the animation director for Jujutsu Kaisen 0, paints a bleak future for the anime industry, suggesting that further bankruptcy is on the horizon.
Anime NAFCA organization embraces AI future – within limits
Importantly, while NAFCA acknowledges that creators should be properly compensated in a future where AI is used, it argues that this is not enough. The group emphasizes a highly dystopian future, saying, “What if, for example, AI generated characters with heads?” Doraemonthe body of gundam, if the voice of Son Goku (Masako Nozawa) is, “You can use this character freely as long as you return an appropriate profit,” I don’t want to proceed with the discussion. Even if a monster created by collaging 100 characters generates a huge amount of revenue, I can’t help but feel uncomfortable with the system in which the revenue is divided among the creators of each character. I would like to firmly say no to the idea that all creators should be satisfied with the return of profits. ”
Nevertheless, NAFCA appears to require multiple systems. NAFCA argues that this is important to implement if creators are happy to have their work used as long as they are compensated. However, the association believes that consideration should also be given to creators who are satisfied with their work being used only in certain circumstances.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2935c/2935cae3ca5f9cd5dc0bc3d4305121002c3c3222" alt="Image of Leiji Matsumoto holding a mirror image of Maetel from Galaxy Express 999"
Leiji Matsumoto’s official promotional video generates deepfake outrage: “May the dead rest in peace”
Anime fans are collectively disgusted by the official AI deepfake of Leiji Matsumoto, creator of Galaxy Express 999 and Space Battleship Yamato.
The group is seeking solutions from the Japanese government, and its members have recently been branded “traitors” by the government. Jujutsu Kaisen 0 Chief Animation Director Terumi Nishii takes issue with AI’s “weak” attitude, and ethical AI developer Anime Chain has created a solution that will allow people to reliably track what materials are being used in training. I’m looking for. This solution uses blockchain technology. By connecting enough users to the network, the aim is to ensure an accurate record of all copyrighted material and to make it incredibly difficult to tamper with it.
Source: NAFCA