Three more news sites have filed lawsuits against Microsoft and OpenAI for copyright infringement, and the legal claims are starting to pile up. The Verge report. intercept, raw story and alternet Another lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT reproduced news content “exactly or nearly verbatim” while removing important attributions such as author names.
All of these sites are represented by the same law firm, and if ChatGPT had been trained on copyright material, it “would have learned how to convey that information when providing a response.” Stated. raw story and alternet OpenAI and Microsoft must have known that if “users believed that ChatGPT responses infringed third-party copyrights,” the chatbot’s popularity would decline and revenue would decline, it added. Ta.
The media outlets point out in the complaint that OpenAI offers an opt-out system for website owners, meaning the company needs to be aware of potential copyright infringement. Microsoft and OpenAI also said they will protect their customers from legal claims for copyright infringement that may arise from the use of their products and will also pay any costs incurred.
The end of last year, new york times It is suing OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement and will “hold them accountable for billions of dollars in statutory and actual damages.” OpenAI asked the court to reject that claim, stating: new york times I took advantage of a bug in ChatGPT to read out the article word for word.
The companies also face lawsuits from multiple nonfiction authors for “massive and intentional theft of copyrighted works,” as well as from comedians. sarah silverman Regarding similar claims.
