When I heard that, samsung galaxy ring That was true, but my first thought was, “What took me so long?”i have seen Oura Ring, there is little competition in this category, even though it makes a lot of sense. I’m surprised Samsung didn’t land on this concept sooner.It’s such a clear victory apple ring It feels inevitable. Ah, that’s right. Apple doesn’t copy Samsung. of course.
I should have put the ring on before the watch. Instead of an Apple Ring, you already need an Apple Ring. apple watch ultra. You can scuba dive with your Apple Watch, but it doesn’t have an Apple Ring. Something is going backwards here.
A ring means much more than a watch. First of all, I have a nice, fancy watch that I wear from time to time. I inherited it from my father, who is still alive, so I like to put it on him and show it off from time to time. I like it better than when it was his. But I still primarily wear his Apple Watch. You can’t lose a day of closed rings.
Indeed, most Apple iPhone owners probably own a watch they’d rather wear than an Apple Watch in some cases. It’s a wealthy group. Even though we mainly tell the time by looking at our phones, watches are still cool. Watches are not only convenient, but also great fashion items. This means you may need multiple watches for different occasions. Must be accessorized.
If you had an Apple Ring instead of an Apple Watch, you wouldn’t mind wearing it all the time. Unlike the Apple Watch, it doesn’t prevent you from wearing other accessories.
Rings are cheaper if you need a new ring every few years
Second, we know that this accessory, whether it’s a ring or a watch, will go out of style at some point, probably within the next two to three years. I plan on trading it in, throwing it away, or leaving it in a drawer. That’s not so easy with the Apple Watch, which costs more than any other watch I’ve purchased. Watches shouldn’t be outdated. Until the Apple Watch, watches never went out of style.
If you need something new, an apple ring is better than losing it. Rings are not as personal as watches. It has no face. I also think the Apple Ring will be cheaper than the Apple Watch. Further miniaturization is required, resulting in higher production and component costs. However, it also has far fewer parts and has no moving parts like the digital crown.
It would be frustrating to have to replace your $200 Apple Ring every two years, but it’s bad enough to realize you need to replace your $600 stainless steel Apple Watch because it doesn’t have the features you want. isn’t it.
Now that wearables are for health, rings make more sense.
Why didn’t the Apple Ring, or even the Galaxy Ring, come out before the Apple Watch in 2015 or the original Samsung Galaxy Gear wearable in 2013? Watchmakers had no idea what wearables were good for.
The wearable device “Galaxy Gear” was equipped with an incredible camera. Is it for video calls? It probably came with an app that could scan wine bottle labels and recommend food pairings. Tell me Samsung knew what wearables were for back then.
Apple fans, please don’t laugh. The original Apple Watch had the ability to record your heart rate and send it to another Apple Watch owner to feel yourself. It has an eerie Facebook Poke feel to it. Oh, and Apple sold the gold version for his $10,000, but that model is no longer officially supported. I can’t name any other gold watch that expires in 10 years.
An expired Apple Watch is no longer a piece of jewelry. It’s worthless. Even if Apple sells his Apple Ring in gold for his $1,000 and stops supporting that ring, at least it’s still a gold ring.
It took a while for smartwatch makers to realize that health is a good enough reason to own a wearable. Everything else is gravy. Notifications can be very useful, especially if you’re working in the field and can’t see your phone screen. Still, the selling point of smartwatches is their health features. No one buys a Galaxy Watch to use it as a viewfinder for their phone’s camera, but sometimes it can be a fun trick.
Now that you’re calm about your health, let’s admit that a ring makes more sense than a watch. It’s easier to wear a ring while exercising, especially if you play contact sports. Rings are more comfortable and easier to ignore than watches, especially if, as in my case, your wrist swells and shrinks in response to hydration. I don’t track my sleep with my watch because it’s not comfortable to wear while sleeping, but I found it easy to fall asleep with the ring on.
After Apple Vision Pro, Apple Ring should be released.
I still don’t understand how Apple Ring interacts with Apple Vision Pro. Because Apple seems to be focusing only on hands for input. But I think eventually wearables and mobile phones will become more involved in space. It’s not just for taking cool spatial photos and videos.
Apple needs to create an Apple Ring quickly. I know Apple will never imitate Samsung. It’s Samsung’s job to copy. At least, that’s how Apple fans see it. Forget that Apple made large phones after Samsung made large phones. Forget that Apple only made its iPhone more waterproof after Samsung did it. And multiple cameras. Wireless charging. I’ll stop, I’ve said what I wanted to say.
