Apple faces its biggest antitrust challenge yet as the Department of Justice (DOJ) targets the tech giant’s alleged control of the smartphone market.
A few years ago, Apple faced a high-profile antitrust challenge from video game company Epic Games over its app store rules, but the tech giant nearly won the challenge. But the wide-ranging allegations raised in the government’s latest complaint will once again test Apple’s rules surrounding its control of the app market.
The complaint alleges that Apple’s creation of the iPhone ecosystem gave it an advantage in the smartphone market, which is now widely available in American households. Apple uses the ‘strategy’ to maintain its dominance across technology, from app stores and messaging platforms to smart watches and digital wallets, and it only works best when used on systems run by Apple. has been accused of creating a service or product that does
“This is the most important challenge they’ve ever faced,” said William Kovačić, former Federal Trade Commission chairman.
Kovacic said the Epic Games lawsuit deals with “serious issues” involving Apple’s systems and provides a glimpse into Apple’s possible defense, with material coming to light through the discovery process. said it was the last lawsuit brought against Apple by the Justice Department and 16 state attorneys general. The week is more important.
“The scope is broader. The range of actions that will be addressed is broader. And in some ways, it makes more sense that there are forces of the U.S. government behind this incident,” he said.
“There are intangible benefits to claiming to represent the interests of the entire United States, rather than just the interests of a single stakeholder,” he added.
The Department of Justice’s complaint makes five key allegations regarding Apple’s conduct. Prosecutors say the company has blocked “super apps” that could surpass its own apps, throttled mobile cloud streaming services, eliminated cross-platform messaging apps and restricted the functionality of third-party smartwatches on Apple devices. It alleges that it restricted the use of third-party digital wallets and prevented the use of third-party digital wallets.
In addition to its existing implementation of the allegedly anticompetitive “strategy,” the complaint alleges that Apple has “every incentive” to follow the same pattern as it expands its business in the future.
“Apple has countless products and services, including AirPods, iPad, Music, Apple TV, Photos, Maps, iTunes, CarPlay, AirDrop, Apple Card, Cash, and more. Provides a prospective means of engaging and avoiding remedies. Appropriate forward-looking remedies are necessary to prevent Apple from using these products and services to further strengthen its monopoly power. “It is necessary,” the complaint states.
Perkins Coy attorney Henry Hauser said the wide-ranging charges could have industry-wide implications depending on how the case unfolds. Mr. Hauser previously worked as a trial attorney in the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and as an attorney in the Technical Enforcement Division of the FTC.
“This is going to impact so many different markets, including financial services, media, entertainment, gaming, and communications,” Hauser said.
Apple strongly objects to the allegations made in the Justice Department’s complaint, arguing that they effectively reduce competition.
“If we succeed, [this lawsuit] This could impede our ability to develop the types of technologies at the intersection of hardware, software and services that people have come to expect from Apple. It would also set a dangerous precedent that would give governments more power over how people design technology. “We believe this lawsuit is wrong on the facts and the law, and we will vigorously defend it,” Apple said in a statement.
An Apple spokesperson also said the antitrust case appears to be on behalf of its larger rivals, rather than the smaller development companies that prosecutors say are hurt by Apple’s dominance. insisted. A spokesperson said Apple is not responsible for other big tech companies with similar resources not being able to provide high-quality smartphones to consumers.
Kovacic said small developers may be more willing to come forward and serve as witnesses now that the Justice Department has filed a complaint.
“If you’re a small business and you’re afraid of crossing swords with powerful organizations that you need to work with to succeed, you can’t take an adversarial position unless you’re convinced that the government is in charge of everything. It can be very passive, it’s come in quite a bit,” he said.
Filing a lawsuit is one way for the government to show “we’re doing our best,” he added.
Apple claims it has helped create more competition by giving users options to use its systems more securely. The company’s argument that restrictions on other devices and apps are essential to keeping its products secure is likely to be a key point of defense. The company used similar arguments to defend itself in its lawsuit against Epic Games under pressure from U.S. and global policymakers.
Sam Weinstein, a Cardozo law professor and former attorney in the Justice Department’s antitrust division, said the security and privacy arguments could be “very persuasive.”
He said the fact that the Justice Department has already mentioned that allegation in the complaint highlights how important it will be as the case moves forward.
In its complaint, the Justice Department claims that Apple “obscures privacy, security, and consumer preferences to justify anti-competitive conduct,” while in reality the company has made text messages less secure. They argued that by arranging transactions, they were “selectively structuring their privacy and security interests.” Google will be made the default search engine “when more private options are available.”
“Ultimately, Apple deploys its privacy and security justifications as elastic shields that can be stretched and contracted to serve Apple’s financial and business interests,” the complaint alleges.
Hauser said the strength of this argument will depend on testimony from technology and industry experts about how important Apple’s policies are.
“Is there a way to reduce exclusionary practices without putting a huge burden on business and without undermining really legitimate pro-competitive goals?” he said.
Apple isn’t the only tech company facing pressure for market power. The Justice Department has filed two lawsuits against Google, one based on search and the other over advertising market power, and the FTC has sued Meta and Amazon over monopoly allegations.
All of the tech giants have pushed back against the allegations leveled against them. In addition to the US case, countries have also had to adapt to new regulations introduced by the European Union that target their market power.
Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.